Daniel Keith

609 citations
26 papers · 357 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Keith

24 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Daniel Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 242
  • Gender Studies 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 58
  • Genetics 20
  • Aging 1
Replace Ian F. W. Beckett with:
Ian F. W. Beckett United Kingdom
Palmira Brummett United States
Mohammed Zeinu Hassen Ethiopia
Julia M. H. Smith United Kingdom
Klaus Vondung Germany
Yael Berda Israel
G. Eley United States
Walter G. Andrews United States
Elizabeth E. Joh United States
Lionel K. McPherson United States
Daniel Keith relative to Ian F. W. Beckett United Kingdom Ian F. W. Beckett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
Ian F. W. Beckett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Keith. The network helps show where Daniel Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Keith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Europe’s Radical Left: From Marginality to the Mainstream?
201676
2 201654
3 201640
4 201627
5 201922
6 202017
7 201715
8 201614
9 201614
10 201012
11 201611
12 201711
13 20237
14 20176
15 20196
16 20236
17 20235
18 20104
19 20233
20 20243

About Daniel Keith

Daniel Keith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Philosophy and Finance, having authored 26 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (11 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (10 papers), Anarchism and Radical Politics (7 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (5 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper) and Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (242 citations), Gender Studies (47 citations), Sociology and Political Science (58 citations), Genetics (20 citations) and Aging (1 citation). Daniel Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Luke March, Tània Verge, Dan Hough, Bice Maiguashca, Giorgos Charalambous, Paul Webb, Sofia Vasilopoulou, Raimondas Ibenskas, Nicole Bolleyer and Charles Lees. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, British Politics, Party Politics, Genetics and West European Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact