William A. Maher

9.8k citations
281 papers · 8.4k · h-index 47

Impact in

Papers in

William A. Maher

276 papers receiving 8.0k citations

Peers

William A. Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 4.5k
  • Environmental Chemistry 2.9k
  • Pollution 3.3k
  • Analytical Chemistry 938
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 515
Replace Nelson Belzile with:
Nelson Belzile Canada
Willy Baeyens Belgium
Paul Nicholas Williams United Kingdom
Kenneth J. Reimer Canada
Herbert E. Allen United States
Samuel J. Traina United States
Dominic M. Di Toro United States
Nicholas S. Fisher United States
Fengchang Wu China
Claire M. Deacon United Kingdom
William A. Maher relative to Nelson Belzile Canada Nelson Belzile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Nelson Belzile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William A. Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William A. Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William A. Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William A. Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William A. Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William A. Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William A. Maher. The network helps show where William A. Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William A. Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William A. Maher Line = papers co-authored together William A. Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 281 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010281
2 2003274
3 2003220
4
Handbook for sediment quality assessment
2005219
5 2005191
6 1988144
7 1994141
8 1995135
9 2001131
10 2009119
11 1992108
12 2006104
13 201489
14 199889
15 200288
16 199782
17 200682
18 199980
19 201079
20 201076

About William A. Maher

William A. Maher is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 281 papers that have together received 8.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heavy metals in environment (100 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (86 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (73 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (68 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (41 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (34 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (31 papers) and Fluoride Effects and Removal (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (4.5k citations), Environmental Chemistry (2.9k citations), Pollution (3.3k citations), Analytical Chemistry (938 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (515 citations). William A. Maher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Frank Krikowa, Simon D. Foster, Michael J. Ellwood, Anne M. Taylor, Jason K. Kirby, Ross V. Hyne, Elliott G. Duncan, Edward C. V. Butler, Graeme E. Batley and Simon C. Apte. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Chemistry, Microchemical Journal, Applied Organometallic Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta and Marine and Freshwater Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact