Willem Halffman

40 papers receiving 861 citations

Peers

Willem Halffman
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Health Informatics 30
  • Ecological Modeling 74
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 100
  • Information Systems and Management 81
  • Safety Research 93
Replace Maximilian Fochler with:
Maximilian Fochler Austria
Brian Rappert United Kingdom
Chaoqun Ni United States
Benedikt Fecher Germany
Desi Rodriguez-Lonebear United States
Ulf Sandström Sweden
Barbara R. MacRoberts United States
Kaare Aagaard Denmark
Liz Allen United Kingdom
Scott Weingart United States
Willem Halffman relative to Maximilian Fochler Austria Maximilian Fochler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Maximilian Fochler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Willem Halffman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Willem Halffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willem Halffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willem Halffman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Willem Halffman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willem Halffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willem Halffman. The network helps show where Willem Halffman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Willem Halffman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Willem Halffman Line = papers co-authored together Willem Halffman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017114
2 2015103
3 201798
4 201094
5 200573
6 201764
7 201953
8 200550
9 201843
10
Boundaries of Regulatory Science
200331
11 201427
12 202025
13 202023
14 202023
15 199822
16
Measuring the Stakes: The Dutch Planning Bureaus
200917
17 200916
18 20199
19 20217
20 20206

About Willem Halffman

Willem Halffman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Global and Planetary Change, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (4 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation (3 papers) and Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (30 citations), Ecological Modeling (74 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (100 citations), Information Systems and Management (81 citations) and Safety Research (93 citations). Willem Halffman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Hong Kong and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Hans Radder, Loet Leydesdorff, Rob Hoppe, R.J.G. van den Born, Wessel Ganzevoort, W. Tuinstra, Esther Turnhout, Roland Bal and Hub Zwart. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Public Policy, Minerva, Research Policy, PeerJ and Science Technology & Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact