Wilhelm Harkmark

534 citations
12 papers · 489 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Wilhelm Harkmark

12 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Wilhelm Harkmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Developmental Neuroscience 113
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 236
  • Sensory Systems 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 140
  • Neurology 53
Replace Louis J. Misantone with:
Louis J. Misantone United States
Verena M. Bucher Switzerland
Masaya Tohyama Japan
Fritz H. Güldner Australia
M Roger France
Elinor R. Arbuthnott Ireland
Lillian M. Pubols United States
Jumpei Naito Japan
Joyce E. Shriver United States
Patrick C. Jackson Canada
Wilhelm Harkmark relative to Louis J. Misantone United States Louis J. Misantone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Louis J. Misantone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wilhelm Harkmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wilhelm Harkmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilhelm Harkmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilhelm Harkmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wilhelm Harkmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilhelm Harkmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilhelm Harkmark. The network helps show where Wilhelm Harkmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Wilhelm Harkmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wilhelm Harkmark Line = papers co-authored together Wilhelm Harkmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1954170
2 197889
3 196147
4 195637
5 196434
6 197529
7 197726
8 195920
9 195613
10 197612
11 195111
12
Cell migrations in the central nervous system as revealed in experiments on chick embryos.
19511

About Wilhelm Harkmark

Wilhelm Harkmark is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (1 paper), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (1 paper), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (113 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (236 citations), Sensory Systems (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations) and Neurology (53 citations). Wilhelm Harkmark has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bolek Srebro, Michael T. Shipley, Svein Ivar Mellgren, Christer Köhler, Birger R. Kaada, Oddvar Stokke, John T Steen, Kristian Uldall Kristiansen and Maynard M. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, The Anatomical Record, Cell and Tissue Research, Acta Neuropathologica and Journal of Experimental Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact