W.G. Eisert

630 citations
30 papers · 446 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

W.G. Eisert

30 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers

W.G. Eisert
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Internal Medicine 44
  • Hematology 57
  • Biophysics 25
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
  • Neurology 60
Replace Elena Puszkin with:
Elena Puszkin United States
Hans‐Peter Holthoff Germany
Paul F. Koster United States
Niklas Bark Sweden
A. Circella Italy
Hae-Rahn Bae South Korea
S. H. Chao United States
W. L. Hanson United States
Kieron South United Kingdom
Stephanie Aker Germany
W.G. Eisert relative to Elena Puszkin United States Elena Puszkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Elena Puszkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.G. Eisert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.G. Eisert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.G. Eisert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.G. Eisert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.G. Eisert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.G. Eisert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.G. Eisert. The network helps show where W.G. Eisert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.G. Eisert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.G. Eisert Line = papers co-authored together W.G. Eisert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199064
2 198952
3 197839
4 199336
5 197924
6 198624
7 200523
8
Biological dosimetry: Cytometric approaches to mammalian systems
198421
9 198919
10 197816
11 200115
12 197515
13 198011
14 198910
15 198110
16 198510
17 19797
18 19866
19 19876
20 19886

About W.G. Eisert

W.G. Eisert is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Biophysics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Hemoglobin structure and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (44 citations), Hematology (57 citations), Biophysics (25 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (99 citations) and Neurology (60 citations). W.G. Eisert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Müller, Lewis J. Noe, P. M. Rentzepis, Wolfgang Beisker, D. Stolke, Volker Seifert, H Weisenberger, Gerhard Nehmiz, Michael R. Buchanan and E. O. Degenkolb. Their work appears in journals such as Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Cytometry, Biophysical Journal, Review of Scientific Instruments and Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact