Wesley Shrum

98 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Wesley Shrum
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 413
  • Communication 399
  • Business and International Management 74
  • Information Systems and Management 208
  • Strategy and Management 417
Replace Stephen Hilgartner with:
Stephen Hilgartner United States
George A. Barnett United States
Diana Crane United States
Daniel A. McFarland United States
Tony Becher United Kingdom
Henry Sauermann Germany
Marion Fourcade United States
Michael Sauder United States
Hugo Horta Hong Kong
Sally Wyatt Netherlands
Wesley Shrum relative to Stephen Hilgartner United States Stephen Hilgartner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Stephen Hilgartner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wesley Shrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wesley Shrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wesley Shrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wesley Shrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wesley Shrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wesley Shrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wesley Shrum. The network helps show where Wesley Shrum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wesley Shrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wesley Shrum Line = papers co-authored together Wesley Shrum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988363
2 2007190
3 2010176
4 2005147
5 1988145
6 2002141
7 1991131
8 200193
9 200784
10
Digital Video as Research Practice: Methodology for the Millennium
200574
11 199766
12 198763
13 200451
14 200551
15 201148
16 201047
17 200047
18 198043
19 200742
20 199742

About Wesley Shrum

Wesley Shrum is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Media Technology, Communication, Information Systems and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (20 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (10 papers), Social Capital and Networks (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers) and International Development and Aid (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (413 citations), Communication (399 citations), Business and International Management (74 citations), Information Systems and Management (208 citations) and Strategy and Management (417 citations). Wesley Shrum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Antonius Ynalvez, Ivan Chompalov, Neil H. Cheek, Joel Genuth, Saundra MacD. Hunter, Robert Wuthnow, Ricardo B. Duque, Paul N. Mbatia, R. Sooryamoorthy and Dan‐Bright S. Dzorgbo. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, Science Technology & Human Values, Social Forces, Scientometrics and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact