Wenna Wang

637 citations
49 papers · 456 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Wenna Wang

46 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Wenna Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Developmental Neuroscience 52
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 23
  • Soil Science 39
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 16
  • Plant Science 103
Replace Wenjie Gu with:
Wenjie Gu China
Elżbieta Dziubałtowska Poland
Hosub Im South Korea
Changchun Hou China
Anna Barbieri Italy
M.L. Keplinger United States
Jianhua Qu China
Ružica Rozgaj Croatia
Yiquan Huang China
Zhimin Wu China
Wenna Wang relative to Wenjie Gu China Wenjie Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Wenjie Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wenna Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wenna Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wenna Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wenna Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wenna Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wenna Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wenna Wang. The network helps show where Wenna Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wenna Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wenna Wang Line = papers co-authored together Wenna Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201856
2 201242
3 201338
4 201528
5 201624
6 201223
7 201718
8 202118
9 202117
10 202117
11 202016
12 202214
13 202313
14 20249
15 20169
16 20237
17 20197
18 20226
19 20226
20 20226

About Wenna Wang

Wenna Wang is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Pharmacology and Soil Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (2 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (23 citations), Soil Science (39 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (16 citations) and Plant Science (103 citations). Wenna Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jiacun Gu, Yan Wang, Leilei Ma, Günter Hoch, Zhengquan Wang, Fei‐Juan Kong, Xinguo Zhang, Shuping Chen, Fengjiang Zhang and Min Yan. Their work appears in journals such as Plant and Soil, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Plant Science, Forests and Skin Research and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact