Wei-Ven Tee

855 citations
22 papers · 672 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Wei-Ven Tee

22 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers

Wei-Ven Tee
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 208
  • Molecular Biology 548
  • Pharmacology 51
  • Oncology 99
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 32
Replace Megan L. Peach with:
Megan L. Peach United States
Valério Berdini United Kingdom
Florian Wakenhut United Kingdom
Nichola L. Davies United Kingdom
Andrew Woodhead Netherlands
Mario G. Cardozo United States
Hans‐Peter Buchstaller Germany
Chaya Duraiswami United States
Kalaimathy Singaravelu Finland
Gerald W. Shipps United States
Wei-Ven Tee relative to Megan L. Peach United States Megan L. Peach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Megan L. Peach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei-Ven Tee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei-Ven Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei-Ven Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei-Ven Tee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei-Ven Tee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei-Ven Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei-Ven Tee. The network helps show where Wei-Ven Tee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Wei-Ven Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei-Ven Tee Line = papers co-authored together Wei-Ven Tee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201682
2 201873
3 202071
4 201856
5 201652
6 201946
7 202138
8 202033
9 202432
10 202030
11 202229
12 202227
13 201726
14 202223
15 202223
16 202416
17 20255
18 20254
19 20163
20 20251

About Wei-Ven Tee

Wei-Ven Tee is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (12 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (11 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (208 citations), Molecular Biology (548 citations), Pharmacology (51 citations), Oncology (99 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (32 citations). Wei-Ven Tee has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Malaysia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Igor N. Berezovsky, Enrico Guarnera, Zhen Wah Tan, Saharuddin Bin Mohamad, Zazali Alias, Md. Zahirul Kabır, Saad Tayyab, Shevin Rizal Feroz, Firdaus Samsudin and Peter J. Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Biology, Nucleic Acids Research, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, Biophysical Journal and Structure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact