Weina Fu

1.5k citations
50 papers · 787 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Weina Fu

45 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Weina Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 284
  • Artificial Intelligence 360
  • Urban Studies 39
  • Media Technology 52
  • Information Systems 132
Replace Jilian Zhang with:
Jilian Zhang China
Ji Ming United Kingdom
Abdullah Al‐Dhelaan Saudi Arabia
Chenglong Wang China
Hesham Alhumyani Saudi Arabia
Federico Chiariotti Italy
Hong-Han Shuai Taiwan
Peiguang Jing China
Weina Fu relative to Jilian Zhang China Jilian Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jilian Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Weina Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Weina Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weina Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weina Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Weina Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Weina Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Weina Fu. The network helps show where Weina Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Weina Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Weina Fu Line = papers co-authored together Weina Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014114
2 202297
3 201684
4 201453
5 201742
6 201936
7 202035
8 202234
9 202232
10 202232
11 201332
12 201324
13 201322
14 202318
15 201515
16 202114
17 202211
18 202510
19 20228
20 20148

About Weina Fu

Weina Fu is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Mathematical Physics and Urban Studies, having authored 50 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI and Multimedia in Education (15 papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (10 papers), Advanced Technologies in Various Fields (9 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (7 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (4 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (4 papers) and AI and Big Data Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (284 citations), Artificial Intelligence (360 citations), Urban Studies (39 citations), Media Technology (52 citations) and Information Systems (132 citations). Weina Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Shuai Liu, Jiantao Zhou, Zheng Pan, Xiaochun Cheng, Ming Ma, Liqiang He, Weiping Ding, Qian‐Zhong Li, Yating Li and Peng Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Mobile Networks and Applications, Multimedia Tools and Applications, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Communications and Networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact