Wei‐Chen Tung

829 citations
66 papers · 615 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Health top 10%
    • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
    • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
    • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Papers in

Wei‐Chen Tung

63 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Wei‐Chen Tung
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Health 49
  • Epidemiology 188
  • General Health Professions 134
  • Infectious Diseases 69
  • Clinical Psychology 78
Replace Sarah B. Maness with:
Sarah B. Maness United States
Mariano Kanamori United States
Joseph TF Lau Hong Kong
Ted Duncan United States
Ching Wong United States
Sandro Provenzano Italy
Benita Weathers United States
Elisabeth P. Gruskin United States
Claudine Burton‐Jeangros Switzerland
Lara S. Savas United States
Wei‐Chen Tung relative to Sarah B. Maness United States Sarah B. Maness's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah B. Maness · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Chen Tung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Chen Tung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Chen Tung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Chen Tung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Chen Tung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Chen Tung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Chen Tung. The network helps show where Wei‐Chen Tung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Chen Tung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei‐Chen Tung Line = papers co-authored together Wei‐Chen Tung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200844
2 201442
3 201431
4 200529
5 201129
6 200827
7 201125
8 202017
9 201917
10 201015
11 200515
12 202015
13 201014
14 201214
15 201013
16 202012
17 201512
18 201712
19 201112
20 201211

About Wei‐Chen Tung

Wei‐Chen Tung is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (18 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (12 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (9 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (7 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (49 citations), Epidemiology (188 citations), General Health Professions (134 citations), Infectious Diseases (69 citations) and Clinical Psychology (78 citations). Wei‐Chen Tung has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Minggen Lu, Daniel M. Cook, Zhizhong Li, Duc-Huy T. Nguyen, Kele Ding, Julie Smith‐Gagen, Michelle L. Granner, Susan L. Beck, Susan M. Ervin and Jie Hu. Their work appears in journals such as International Nursing Review, Health Care For Women International, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, Public Health Nursing and Journal of American College Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact