W.E. Huff

9.2k citations
174 papers · 7.8k · h-index 55

Impact in

Papers in

W.E. Huff

173 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Peers

W.E. Huff
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Animal Science and Zoology 3.3k
  • Insect Science 1.5k
  • Plant Science 3.8k
  • Microbiology 562
  • Food Science 1.4k
Replace L.F. Kubena with:
L.F. Kubena United States
Donald E. Corrier United States
Gerd Schatzmayr Austria
John R. DeLoach United States
M. Choct Australia
Jürgen Zentek Germany
Ricarda M. Engberg Denmark
H.M. Scott United States
W. L. Bryden Australia
R. D. Wyatt United States
W.E. Huff relative to L.F. Kubena United States L.F. Kubena's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L.F. Kubena · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.E. Huff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.E. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.E. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.E. Huff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.E. Huff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.E. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.E. Huff. The network helps show where W.E. Huff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.E. Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.E. Huff Line = papers co-authored together W.E. Huff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 174 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000369
2 1990173
3 2005157
4 1990151
5 1992142
6 1993139
7 2008135
8 2000132
9 1988127
10 1986126
11 2007125
12 1981125
13 2004118
14 1986113
15 2002110
16 1974106
17 1982106
18 2005103
19 1975101
20 199196

About W.E. Huff

W.E. Huff is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Insect Science, Food Science and Immunology, having authored 174 papers that have together received 7.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (85 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (66 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (54 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (19 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (18 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (17 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (15 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (3.3k citations), Insect Science (1.5k citations), Plant Science (3.8k citations), Microbiology (562 citations) and Food Science (1.4k citations). W.E. Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include N.C. Rath, G.R. Huff, L.F. Kubena, J.M. Balog, Roger B. Harvey, R.B. HARVEY, J. A. Doerr, Donald E. Corrier, P.B. Hamilton and Timothy D. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Avian Diseases, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact