Warwick Hosking

1.2k citations
25 papers · 916 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors 5
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 3
    • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 5
    • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 3

Warwick Hosking

22 papers receiving 892 citations

Peers

Warwick Hosking
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Physiology 417
  • Social Psychology 200
  • Clinical Psychology 158
  • General Decision Sciences 9
Replace Kimberly Kobus with:
Kimberly Kobus United States
Regina J. J. M. Van Den Eijnden Netherlands
Tamar M. J. Antin United States
Monica Reis-Bergan United States
Tesfa N. Alexander United States
Esther Backbier Netherlands
Theda Radtke Switzerland
Simani Price United States
Donald W. Helme United States
Lynn A. Fisher United States
Warwick Hosking relative to Kimberly Kobus United States Kimberly Kobus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Kimberly Kobus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Warwick Hosking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Warwick Hosking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warwick Hosking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warwick Hosking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Warwick Hosking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warwick Hosking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warwick Hosking. The network helps show where Warwick Hosking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Warwick Hosking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Warwick Hosking Line = papers co-authored together Warwick Hosking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009258
2 2009245
3 201474
4 201353
5 201451
6 200844
7 201328
8 201126
9 201226
10 202123
11 201317
12 202115
13 202214
14 202312
15 20189
16 20165
17 20224
18 20223
19 20173
20 20153

About Warwick Hosking

Warwick Hosking is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Gender Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (122 citations), Physiology (417 citations), Social Psychology (200 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). Warwick Hosking has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Lyons, Geoffrey T. Fong, Ann McNeill, David Hammond, K. Michael Cummings, Ron Borland, Hua‐Hie Yong, James F. Thrasher, Nick Wilson and Gerard Hastings. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Sexual Behavior, BMC Psychology, Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Homosexuality and AIDS and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact