Walter Böhm

51 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Walter Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Management Information Systems 82
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 24
  • Ceramics and Composites 36
  • Management Science and Operations Research 70
  • Statistics and Probability 40
Replace Jan Rutten with:
Jan Rutten Netherlands
Maho Nakata Japan
Dana Randall United States
Toshiro Watanabe Japan
Russ Bubley United Kingdom
Naresh C. Jain United States
Richard J. Barton United States
Bryan L. Shader United States
José Luis Palacios Venezuela
Jan Krajı́ček Czechia
Walter Böhm relative to Jan Rutten Netherlands Jan Rutten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Jan Rutten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Walter Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Walter Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Walter Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter Böhm. The network helps show where Walter Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Walter Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Walter Böhm Line = papers co-authored together Walter Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1959103
2 196233
3 197232
4 198531
5
Exact Uniform Initialization For Genetic Programming.
199627
6 199125
7 198123
8 198421
9 200519
10 200018
11 199318
12 197117
13 197216
14 199715
15 198415
16 201412
17 201011
18 198811
19 199611
20 201210

About Walter Böhm

Walter Böhm is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mathematical Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (13 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (9 papers), Probability and Risk Models (9 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (8 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Diffusion and Search Dynamics (5 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers) and Random Matrices and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (82 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (24 citations), Ceramics and Composites (36 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (70 citations) and Statistics and Probability (40 citations). Walter Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include F. Cramer, S. G. Mohanty, W. Prettl, H. G. Kahle, Kurt Hornik, Andreas Geyer-Schulz, Friedrich Cramer, A. Kasten, Peter Hackl and Eckehard Schöll. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, physica status solidi (b), Physical Review Letters and Queueing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact