W. T. Easterbrook

411 citations
18 papers · 246 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

W. T. Easterbrook

17 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

W. T. Easterbrook
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 45
  • Economics and Econometrics 110
  • History and Philosophy of Science 9
  • Demography 18
  • Urban Studies 9
Replace Albert H. Imlah with:
Albert H. Imlah United States
Peter Wiles United Kingdom
D. A. Farnie United Kingdom
Wolfgang F. Stolper United States
W. O. Henderson United Kingdom
Jan S. Prybyla United States
T. S. Ashton United Kingdom
William Letwin United Kingdom
Robert E. Riegel United Kingdom
S. Herbert Frankel United States
W. T. Easterbrook relative to Albert H. Imlah United States Albert H. Imlah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Albert H. Imlah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Easterbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Easterbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Easterbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Easterbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Easterbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Easterbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Easterbrook. The network helps show where W. T. Easterbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside W. T. Easterbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. T. Easterbrook Line = papers co-authored together W. T. Easterbrook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 196391
2 196740
3 196524
4 195318
5
Evaluating new hypodermic and intradermal injection devices.
200612
6 19539
7 19538
8 19597
9
Approaches to Canadian Economic History: A Selection of Essays
19677
10 19577
11 19605
12 19595
13 19534
14 19593
15 19602
16 19542
17 19601
18 19601

About W. T. Easterbrook

W. T. Easterbrook is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Physiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (1 paper), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (45 citations), Economics and Econometrics (110 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Demography (18 citations) and Urban Studies (9 citations). W. T. Easterbrook has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mel Watkins, Ronald J. Pettis, Hugh G. J. Aitken, Frank Thistlethwaite, E. E. Rich and Winston Churchill. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Economic History, The Economic Journal, The Business History Review, South Atlantic Quarterly and Revista Mexicana de Sociología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact