W. Schmidt

573 citations
46 papers · 414 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W. Schmidt

42 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

W. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Condensed Matter Physics 141
  • Rehabilitation 73
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 120
  • Insect Science 62
Replace James P. Ebel with:
James P. Ebel United States
Tomohiro Imai Japan
K. Hamada Japan
D. Raasch Germany
C. Hajdu Hungary
Neysha Lobo‐Ploch Germany
J. Jansons Latvia
Seiji Kawado Japan
Hong Chul Choi South Korea
G. V. Saparin Russia
W. Schmidt relative to James P. Ebel United States James P. Ebel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
James P. Ebel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schmidt. The network helps show where W. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together W. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200283
2 200554
3 200945
4 200538
5 199525
6 199217
7 201115
8 197515
9 201010
10 19899
11 20068
12 20088
13 19908
14 19927
15 20177
16 19975
17 20075
18 19845
19 20105
20 20044

About W. Schmidt

W. Schmidt is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Radiation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (3 papers) and Infrared Thermography in Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (141 citations), Rehabilitation (73 citations), Occupational Therapy (30 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (120 citations) and Insect Science (62 citations). W. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Wollina, Dieter Faßler, Kristin Liebold, Michael Hartmann, J. Spałek, R. Geick, G. Will, P. Steffens, Satoru Nakatsuji and Fumihiko Nakamura. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Skin Research and Technology, Physical Review B and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact