W. Prusseit

2.4k citations
108 papers · 2.0k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

W. Prusseit

106 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

W. Prusseit
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.6k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 559
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 502
  • Biomedical Engineering 629
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 667
Replace Paul N. Barnes with:
Paul N. Barnes United States
Kentaro Setsune Japan
Timothy J. Haugan United States
K. Kakimoto Japan
W. V. Lundin Russia
P. Berberich Germany
R. Semerad Germany
D. Dew‐Hughes United Kingdom
Y. Iijima Japan
W. Goldacker Germany
W. Prusseit relative to Paul N. Barnes United States Paul N. Barnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul N. Barnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Prusseit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Prusseit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Prusseit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Prusseit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Prusseit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Prusseit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Prusseit. The network helps show where W. Prusseit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Prusseit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Prusseit Line = papers co-authored together W. Prusseit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199885
2 200582
3 199780
4 199480
5 199680
6 200178
7 199772
8 200472
9 200567
10 200564
11 200263
12 199256
13 199555
14 200552
15 201241
16 200537
17 200737
18 199736
19 199636
20 199631

About W. Prusseit

W. Prusseit is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (91 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (26 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (24 papers), ZnO doping and properties (16 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (16 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (10 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (9 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.6k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (559 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (502 citations), Biomedical Engineering (629 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (667 citations). W. Prusseit has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Semerad, H. Kinder, P. Berberich, B. Utz, M. Sugano, Kōzō Osamura, R. Nemetschek, J. Eickemeyer, Georg Sigl and Kiyoshi Takahashi. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact