W. Lanier Thacker

68 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

W. Lanier Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Endocrinology 1.0k
  • Microbiology 521
  • Epidemiology 789
  • Infectious Diseases 436
  • Immunology 271
Replace Gary N. Sanden with:
Gary N. Sanden United States
Søren Anker Uldum Denmark
H W Wilkinson United States
Washington C. Winn United States
Jette Bangsborg Denmark
G. W. Gorman United States
H. James Beecham United States
J. B. Kurtz United Kingdom
C. V. Broome United States
Anneke van der Zee Netherlands
W. Lanier Thacker relative to Gary N. Sanden United States Gary N. Sanden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gary N. Sanden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Lanier Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Lanier Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Lanier Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Lanier Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Lanier Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Lanier Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Lanier Thacker. The network helps show where W. Lanier Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Lanier Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Lanier Thacker Line = papers co-authored together W. Lanier Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985142
2 2008139
3 200899
4 199076
5 200570
6 200768
7 198567
8 200465
9 200060
10 200652
11 199550
12 199250
13 199948
14 199348
15 197845
16 199843
17 200143
18 200841
19 197741
20 198740

About W. Lanier Thacker

W. Lanier Thacker is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (32 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (20 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (15 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (12 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (12 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (10 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (1.0k citations), Microbiology (521 citations), Epidemiology (789 citations), Infectious Diseases (436 citations) and Immunology (271 citations). W. Lanier Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Benson, D J Brenner, Deborah F. Talkington, H W Wilkinson, Jonas M. Winchell, Vester J. Lewis, Stephanie Schwartz, W R Mayberry, Bernard J. Wolff and Barry S. Fields. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Clinical Infectious Diseases, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact