W. Good

84 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

W. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Filtration and Separation 134
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 96
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 69
  • Nephrology 55
  • Electrochemistry 36
Replace John M. Scott with:
John M. Scott Ireland
David O. Tinker United States
Stuart B. Dubin United States
Betsy J. Stover United States
Werner Kühn Switzerland
Masatoshi Fujii Japan
Morton E. Wacks United States
Fumiyuki Ito Japan
R. S. B. King United States
John E. Aldrich Canada
W. Good relative to John M. Scott Ireland John M. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.5×
John M. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Good. The network helps show where W. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Good Line = papers co-authored together W. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196749
2 198126
3 196425
4 199823
5 196922
6 197520
7 196520
8 201419
9 196019
10 197115
11 199714
12 199714
13 196714
14 197314
15 197313
16 197113
17 197513
18 196612
19 197012
20 196612

About W. Good

W. Good is a scholar working on Physiology, Filtration and Separation, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 91 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (14 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (13 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (13 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (7 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (7 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (134 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (96 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (69 citations), Nephrology (55 citations) and Electrochemistry (36 citations). W. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include H. N. Macdonald, K. W. Hancock, Joan Stone, D.B. Ingham, Lakshmi N. Roy, Rabindra N. Roy, F. Franks, D.M. Jenkins, Huey-Wen Lin and William J. Emery. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Electrochimica Acta, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact