W. Caleb McDaniel

836 citations
26 papers · 653 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

W. Caleb McDaniel

23 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

W. Caleb McDaniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Polymers and Plastics 111
  • Materials Chemistry 280
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Organic Chemistry 128
  • Biomaterials 56
Replace Christopher T. Burns with:
Christopher T. Burns United States
Dean Cairns United Arab Emirates
Shaoyin Zhu China
Dongsheng Wang China
Amrita Basu United States
Simone Zanarini Italy
Paul M. Slattum United States
Hong‐Bo Cheng China
W. Caleb McDaniel relative to Christopher T. Burns United States Christopher T. Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Christopher T. Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Caleb McDaniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Caleb McDaniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Caleb McDaniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Caleb McDaniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Caleb McDaniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Caleb McDaniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Caleb McDaniel. The network helps show where W. Caleb McDaniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside W. Caleb McDaniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Caleb McDaniel Line = papers co-authored together W. Caleb McDaniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007161
2 2009113
3 201291
4 200743
5 201237
6 199135
7 197733
8 200726
9 198319
10
The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery: Garrisonian Abolitionists and Transatlantic Reform
201318
11 197814
12 200814
13 200612
14 20059
15 19826
16 20115
17 19913
18 20143
19 20092
20 20132

About W. Caleb McDaniel

W. Caleb McDaniel is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Organic Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Materials Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications (2 papers) and Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (111 citations), Materials Chemistry (280 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Organic Chemistry (128 citations) and Biomaterials (56 citations). W. Caleb McDaniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Joong Ho Moon, Lawrence F. Hancock, Paul S. MacLean, Herbert O. House, Nur Aida Abdul Rahim, Vernella Vickerman, Peter T. C. So, John D. Joannopoulos, Alexander Gumennik and Fabien Sorin. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Common Knowledge, Atlantic Studies and American Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact