Volker Bach

2.6k citations
94 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Volker Bach

83 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Volker Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Mathematical Physics 753
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 543
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 755
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Strategy and Management 168
Replace Werner Kirsch with:
Werner Kirsch Germany
André Joyal Canada
Eberhard R. Hilf Germany
Qinghai Wang United States
Michel Bauer France
Bertrand Berche France
Ronald B. Morgan United States
Haim Shore Israel
Vadim Linetsky United States
Paul Ginsparg United States
Volker Bach relative to Werner Kirsch Germany Werner Kirsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Werner Kirsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Volker Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Volker Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Volker Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Volker Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Volker Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Volker Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Volker Bach. The network helps show where Volker Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Volker Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Volker Bach Line = papers co-authored together Volker Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998185
2 1999131
3 199899
4 200098
5 201479
6 199277
7 199559
8 199449
9 199948
10 200148
11 200344
12 200040
13 200635
14 199932
15 200632
16 201426
17 199324
18 200023
19 199922
20 200017

About Volker Bach

Volker Bach is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Strategy and Management and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (38 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (27 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (20 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (14 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (11 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (7 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers) and Numerical methods in inverse problems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (753 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (543 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (755 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations) and Strategy and Management (168 citations). Volker Bach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jürg Fröhlich, Israel Michael Sigal, Hubert Österle, Luigi Delle Site, Thomas Chen, Alessandro Pizzo, Élliott H. Lieb, Frédéric Thiesse, Jan Philip Solovej and Michael Loss. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Documenta Mathematica, Journal of Functional Analysis, Letters in Mathematical Physics and Annales Henri Poincaré.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact