Viktor Zaverkin

13 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Viktor Zaverkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 120
  • Structural Biology 8
  • Materials Chemistry 237
  • Spectroscopy 65
  • Catalysis 20
Replace Louis Thiry with:
Louis Thiry France
Michael J. Willatt Switzerland
Junjie Yang United States
Amanda Dewyer United States
Federico Grasselli Italy
Maria Carolina Muniz United States
Julia Westermayr Germany
Marius R. Bittermann Netherlands
Jonas A. Finkler Switzerland
Silvan Käser Switzerland
Viktor Zaverkin relative to Louis Thiry France Louis Thiry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Louis Thiry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Viktor Zaverkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Viktor Zaverkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Viktor Zaverkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Viktor Zaverkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Viktor Zaverkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Viktor Zaverkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Viktor Zaverkin. The network helps show where Viktor Zaverkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Viktor Zaverkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Viktor Zaverkin Line = papers co-authored together Viktor Zaverkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 202072
2 202332
3 202128
4 202226
5 202425
6 202024
7 202223
8 202318
9 202116
10 202316
11 202113
12 202111
13 20189
14 20250

About Viktor Zaverkin

Viktor Zaverkin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning in Materials Science (10 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (120 citations), Structural Biology (8 citations), Materials Chemistry (237 citations), Spectroscopy (65 citations) and Catalysis (20 citations). Viktor Zaverkin has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Kästner, Germán Molpeceres, Ingo Steinwart, Kenji Furuya, Naoki Watanabe, Andreas Köhn, Andrew Ian Duff, Makoto Takamoto, Federico Errica and Prashanth Srinivasan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, npj Computational Materials, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Machine Learning Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact