Vikram Goel
Impact in
-
- Cryospheric studies and observations
- Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
- Climate change and permafrost
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
-
- Landslides and related hazards
Papers in
-
- Cryospheric studies and observations 7
- Climate change and permafrost 2
- Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics 1
-
- Winter Sports Injuries and Performance 6
- Co-authors
- Kenichi Matsuoka (7 shared papers)Joel Brown (1 shared paper)Geir Moholdt (2 shared papers)R. Forsberg (1 shared paper)Carlos Martín (2 shared papers)Jørgen Dall (1 shared paper)Meloth Thamban (1 shared paper)Bhanu Pratap (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Glaciology (3 papers)The cryosphere (2 papers)Frontiers in Earth Science (1 paper)Antarctic Science (1 paper)Australasian Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NorwayIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Vikram Goel
8 papers receiving 67 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Atmospheric Science 60
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 14
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 37
- Ecology 12
- Oceanography 4
Countries citing papers authored by Vikram Goel
This map shows the geographic impact of Vikram Goel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vikram Goel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vikram Goel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vikram Goel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vikram Goel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vikram Goel. The network helps show where Vikram Goel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Vikram Goel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 2 |
About Vikram Goel
Vikram Goel is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 68 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryospheric studies and observations (7 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (6 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers), Landslides and related hazards (2 papers), Climate change and permafrost (2 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (60 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (14 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (37 citations), Ecology (12 citations) and Oceanography (4 citations). Vikram Goel has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenichi Matsuoka, Joel Brown, Geir Moholdt, R. Forsberg, Carlos Martín, Jørgen Dall, Meloth Thamban, Bhanu Pratap, C. M. Laluraj and Katrin Lindbäck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Glaciology, The cryosphere, Frontiers in Earth Science, Antarctic Science and Australasian Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.