Vania E. Kenanova

1.1k citations
24 papers · 988 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Vania E. Kenanova

24 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

Vania E. Kenanova
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 761
  • Pharmaceutical Science 31
  • Biomaterials 36
  • Oncology 63
  • Ophthalmology 17
Replace Abdelkader Bennaghmouch with:
Abdelkader Bennaghmouch Netherlands
Alan Cuthbertson Germany
Izumi O. Umeda Japan
Desiree M. Crow United States
Chizuru Sogawa Japan
Muhsin H. Younis United States
Karin Leotta Germany
A. P. Wunder Germany
Anthony Manibusan United States
Antonia Richter Germany
Vania E. Kenanova relative to Abdelkader Bennaghmouch Netherlands Abdelkader Bennaghmouch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Abdelkader Bennaghmouch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vania E. Kenanova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vania E. Kenanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vania E. Kenanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vania E. Kenanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vania E. Kenanova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vania E. Kenanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vania E. Kenanova. The network helps show where Vania E. Kenanova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vania E. Kenanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vania E. Kenanova Line = papers co-authored together Vania E. Kenanova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005174
2 2005133
3 200589
4 200777
5 200965
6 200655
7 201750
8 200649
9 201138
10 201036
11 201035
12 201034
13 201134
14 200830
15 201230
16 200816
17 201114
18 20109
19 20108
20 20144

About Vania E. Kenanova

Vania E. Kenanova is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pharmaceutical Science, Ophthalmology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (16 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (10 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (1 paper) and Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (761 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (31 citations), Biomaterials (36 citations), Oncology (63 citations) and Ophthalmology (17 citations). Vania E. Kenanova has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anna M. Wu, Tove Olafsen, Andrew Antony Raubitschek, Lawrence E. Williams, Paul J. Yazaki, John E. Shively, Sanjiv Sam Gambhir, Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan, Desiree M. Crow and David M. Colcher. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Journal of Surgical Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Protein Engineering Design and Selection and EJNMMI Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact