Vanda Clemente

668 citations
26 papers · 463 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Vanda Clemente

24 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Vanda Clemente
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 241
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 95
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 150
  • Physiology 125
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 10
Replace Debora Meneo with:
Debora Meneo Italy
Silvia G. Conway Brazil
Dorrie Rizzo Canada
Alessia Beracci Italy
Michele L. Okun United States
Alyssa Cairns United States
Diana C. Dolan United States
Kristina Puzino United States
Sayaka Aritake‐Okada Japan
Craig Canapari United States
Vanda Clemente relative to Debora Meneo Italy Debora Meneo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Debora Meneo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vanda Clemente

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanda Clemente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanda Clemente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanda Clemente more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vanda Clemente

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanda Clemente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanda Clemente. The network helps show where Vanda Clemente may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vanda Clemente, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vanda Clemente Line = papers co-authored together Vanda Clemente links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000145
2 200860
3 202340
4 201430
5 201528
6 202027
7 201823
8 201316
9 201712
10 202012
11 201711
12 202010
13 20179
14 20199
15 20167
16 20147
17 20236
18 20233
19 20062
20 20202

About Vanda Clemente

Vanda Clemente is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (21 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (15 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (241 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (95 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations), Physiology (125 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (10 citations). Vanda Clemente has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ana Allen Gomes, Daniel Ruivo Marques, Maria Helena Pinto de Azevedo, David Gozal, José Moutinho dos Santos, Isabel Coelho, Miguel Castelo‐Branco, Carlos Fernandes da Silva, Anabela Pereira and Charles M. Morin. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, Journal of Sleep Research, New Ideas in Psychology, European Psychologist and Value in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact