Ute Pieper

400 citations
8 papers · 190 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Pieper

7 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Ute Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 83
  • Development 14
  • Economics and Econometrics 96
  • Finance 17
  • Political Science and International Relations 37
Replace A. G. Kenwood with:
A. G. Kenwood Australia
Robert Marjolin
Alfred Tovias Israel
Paul Studenski
Arie Arnon Israel
Mine Zeynep Senses United States
Rose J. Spalding United States
Maria da Conceição Tavares Brazil
Juan A. Bogliaccini Uruguay
Vladimer Papava Georgia
Ute Pieper relative to A. G. Kenwood Australia A. G. Kenwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
A. G. Kenwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Pieper. The network helps show where Ute Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ute Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Ute Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 200059
2 199852
3 200348
4 201213
5
Openness and structural dynamics of productivity and employment in developing countries : a case of de-industrialization ?
199811
6
Reconciling Economic Reform and Sustainable Human Devlopment: Social Consequences of Neo-Liberalism
20014
7 19983
8 19980

About Ute Pieper

Ute Pieper is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper), Firm Innovation and Growth (1 paper), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper), Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management (1 paper) and Indian Economic and Social Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (83 citations), Development (14 citations), Economics and Econometrics (96 citations), Finance (17 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (37 citations). Ute Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lance Taylor, Employment and Lauren A. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, The Journal of Development Studies, Research Publications (Maastricht University) and Deutscher Universitätsverlag eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact