Ursula Mocek

1.3k citations
28 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
    • Fungal Biology and Applications
    • Marine Sponges and Natural Products

Papers in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 15
    • Fungal Biology and Applications 4
    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 4
    • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 3

Ursula Mocek

28 papers receiving 954 citations

Peers

Ursula Mocek
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Pharmacology 499
  • Biotechnology 127
  • Organic Chemistry 422
  • Toxicology 27
  • Molecular Biology 500
Replace H.‐W. Fehlhaber with:
H.‐W. Fehlhaber Germany
Tetsuo Tokiwano Japan
Latchezar S. Trifonov Bulgaria
Kazuteru Yokose Japan
Hartwig Müller Germany
Hans‐Josef Altenbach Germany
TARO NIIDA United Kingdom
Shanteri Singh United States
Sloan Ayers United States
Lolita O. Zamir Canada
Ursula Mocek relative to H.‐W. Fehlhaber Germany H.‐W. Fehlhaber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H.‐W. Fehlhaber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Mocek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Mocek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Mocek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Mocek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Mocek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Mocek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Mocek. The network helps show where Ursula Mocek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ursula Mocek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ursula Mocek Line = papers co-authored together Ursula Mocek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199394
2 199394
3 199079
4 199368
5 198361
6 198561
7 198959
8 199353
9 199446
10 199444
11 199536
12 199434
13 199331
14 198930
15 199330
16 199428
17 199726
18 200325
19 199621
20 200318

About Ursula Mocek

Ursula Mocek is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Oncology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (15 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (499 citations), Biotechnology (127 citations), Organic Chemistry (422 citations), Toxicology (27 citations) and Molecular Biology (500 citations). Ursula Mocek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Azerbaijan. Frequent co-authors include Heinz G. Floss, John M. Beale, Wölfgang Steglich, Timm Anke, Paul Fleming, Helmut Besl, Pei Zhou, Bert Steffan, Andrew R. Knaggs and David O’Hagan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Antibiotics, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Natural Products and Journal of Basic Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact