Umar Farooq

986 citations
54 papers · 630 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Umar Farooq

49 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Umar Farooq
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Soil Science 172
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133
  • Animal Science and Zoology 91
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 86
  • Plant Science 207
Replace William F. Lazarus with:
William F. Lazarus United States
P. Ravi Kanth Reddy India
Peter Ranum United States
Gerold Rahmann Germany
Marjatta Eilittä United States
O. Ohiokpehai Kenya
J. Kienzle Italy
Fetien Abay Ethiopia
B.G. Sims United Kingdom
M. Albaho Kuwait
Umar Farooq relative to William F. Lazarus United States William F. Lazarus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
William F. Lazarus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Umar Farooq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Umar Farooq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umar Farooq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umar Farooq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Umar Farooq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umar Farooq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umar Farooq. The network helps show where Umar Farooq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Umar Farooq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Umar Farooq Line = papers co-authored together Umar Farooq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007106
2 202461
3 201058
4 202055
5 202242
6 200132
7 200926
8 200724
9 201120
10 202219
11 200719
12 202314
13 201812
14 201311
15
Attaining and Maintaining Self-sufficiency in Wheat Production: Institutional Efforts and Farmers' Limitations
200010
16 201810
17 20079
18 20179
19 20148
20 20137

About Umar Farooq

Umar Farooq is a scholar working on Plant Science, Animal Science and Zoology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (18 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (9 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (7 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (7 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers) and Agricultural Science and Fertilization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (172 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (133 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (91 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (86 citations) and Plant Science (207 citations). Umar Farooq has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, South Africa and China. Frequent co-authors include Olaf Erenstein, Muhammad Sharif, Munir Ahmad, R. K. Malik, Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Shahbaz, Irek Malecki, Noel Russell, Trevor Young and Graeme B. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Theriogenology, Animals, BMC Veterinary Research and Frontiers in Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact