Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Sciences more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Sciences.
About Veterinary Sciences
The 3.5k papers published in Veterinary Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Veterinary Sciences usually cover Equine (151 papers), Small Animals (662 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (604 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (570 papers) and Microbiology (258 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Oncology Research (262 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (233 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (227 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (207 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (206 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (191 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (188 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Sciences are Roger A. Hart, Gary T. Moore, Stephen K. Wikel, Janice Lloyd, Rosanna Marsella, Claire M. Cannon, Sara Domingues, Gabriela Silva, Peter Hristov and Rositsa Shumkova.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.