Umar Chaudhry

33 papers receiving 883 citations

Umar Chaudhry's Hit Papers

Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy 2021 · 222 citations
2220+1+3Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Umar Chaudhry
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Health 190
  • Modeling and Simulation 38
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 160
  • Infectious Diseases 83
  • Surgery 163
Replace Nismat Javed with:
Nismat Javed United States
Caroline Thomas France
Rajesh Patel United States
Andrew S. Resnick United States
Pavol Šurda United Kingdom
Na Zeng China
Marco Antônio Prado Nunes Brazil
Matthew Whitaker United Kingdom
Ömer R. Saka Belgium
Jeehyoung Kim South Korea
Umar Chaudhry relative to Nismat Javed United States Nismat Javed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Nismat Javed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Umar Chaudhry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Umar Chaudhry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umar Chaudhry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umar Chaudhry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Umar Chaudhry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umar Chaudhry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umar Chaudhry. The network helps show where Umar Chaudhry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Umar Chaudhry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Umar Chaudhry Line = papers co-authored together Umar Chaudhry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy
Hit paper breakdown →
2021222
2 2012150
3 2020109
4 201286
5 202145
6 202133
7 201528
8 202021
9 201420
10 202118
11 201418
12 200916
13 202216
14 202015
15 202315
16 201413
17 202311
18 201510
19 20158
20 20246

About Umar Chaudhry

Umar Chaudhry is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (190 citations), Modeling and Simulation (38 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (160 citations), Infectious Diseases (83 citations) and Surgery (163 citations). Umar Chaudhry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Linda Bauld, Katja Doerholt, Azeem Majeed, Mohammad S Razai, Thanos Athanasiou, Tess Harris, Derek G. Cook, Christopher Rao, Ara Darzi and Hutan Ashrafian. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact