Uma Prawat
Impact in
- Toxicology top 5%
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
- Plant chemical constituents analysis 4
- Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies 4
-
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 6
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 5
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 4
- Co-authors
- Surat Laphookhieo (10 shared papers)Pittaya Tuntiwachwuttikul (10 shared papers)Sarot Cheenpracha (8 shared papers)Thunwadee Ritthiwigrom (5 shared papers)Wisanu Maneerat (5 shared papers)Wong Phakhodee (4 shared papers)Suwanna Deachathai (3 shared papers)Brian W. Skelton (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Uma Prawat
24 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Toxicology 49
- Biochemistry 84
- Horticulture 9
- Pharmacology 67
- Plant Science 224
Countries citing papers authored by Uma Prawat
This map shows the geographic impact of Uma Prawat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uma Prawat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uma Prawat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Uma Prawat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uma Prawat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uma Prawat. The network helps show where Uma Prawat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Uma Prawat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 3 |
About Uma Prawat
Uma Prawat is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (9 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (4 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (4 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers) and Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (49 citations), Biochemistry (84 citations), Horticulture (9 citations), Pharmacology (67 citations) and Plant Science (224 citations). Uma Prawat has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Surat Laphookhieo, Pittaya Tuntiwachwuttikul, Sarot Cheenpracha, Thunwadee Ritthiwigrom, Wisanu Maneerat, Wong Phakhodee, Suwanna Deachathai, Brian W. Skelton, Somsak Ruchirawat and Nisakorn Saewan. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry Letters, Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Journal of Natural Products and Fitoterapia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.