Ulrika Hellsten

475 citations
4 papers · 339 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Total Quality Management (1 paper)The TQM Journal (1 paper)
Partner nations
Sweden

In The Last Decade

Ulrika Hellsten

3 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Ulrika Hellsten
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Management Information Systems 253
  • Strategy and Management 186
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 73
  • Management Science and Operations Research 80
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 8
Replace Ziaul Huq with:
Ziaul Huq United States
Louise Boulter United Kingdom
R.E. McQuater United Kingdom
Djoko Setijono Sweden
Borut Rusjan Slovenia
J.F.B. Gieskes Netherlands
Cassandra C. Elrod United States
Kay Chuan Tan Singapore
Marwan A. Wafa United States
Thomas C. Tuttle United States
Ulrika Hellsten relative to Ziaul Huq United States Ziaul Huq's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ziaul Huq · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrika Hellsten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrika Hellsten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrika Hellsten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrika Hellsten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrika Hellsten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrika Hellsten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrika Hellsten. The network helps show where Ulrika Hellsten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ulrika Hellsten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrika Hellsten Line = papers co-authored together Ulrika Hellsten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 2000310
2
The springboard : a TQM-based tool for self-assessment
199721
3 19977
4
Possibilities, obstacles and tools for implementing TQM in small and medium-sized enterprises
19991

About Ulrika Hellsten

Ulrika Hellsten is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 4 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Quality and Management Systems (1 paper), Collaboration in agile enterprises (1 paper), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (1 paper) and Operations Management Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (253 citations), Strategy and Management (186 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (73 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (80 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (8 citations). Ulrika Hellsten has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Bengt Klefsjö, Mats Deleryd and Rickard Garvare. Their work appears in journals such as Total Quality Management and The TQM Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact