Udo Polzer
Impact in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 6
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 1
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang Gäebel (1 shared paper)Wolfgang Wölwer (1 shared paper)J. Klingelhöfer (2 shared papers)F. A. Hoffmann (2 shared papers)Hans Wolfgang Kölmel (2 shared papers)Hartmut Schulz (2 shared papers)S. Merkelbach (2 shared papers)Anja Haag (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (2 papers)Neurology (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Journal of Sleep Research (1 paper)European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Udo Polzer
12 papers receiving 981 citations
Udo Polzer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 666
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Neurology 25
- Neurology 35
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Udo Polzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Polzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Polzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Polzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Polzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Polzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Polzer. The network helps show where Udo Polzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Udo Polzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 747 |
| 2 | 1996 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 0 |
About Udo Polzer
Udo Polzer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Rheumatology, Neurology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (666 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Neurology (25 citations), Neurology (35 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations). Udo Polzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Gäebel, Wolfgang Wölwer, J. Klingelhöfer, F. A. Hoffmann, Hans Wolfgang Kölmel, Hartmut Schulz, S. Merkelbach, Anja Haag, Fabian Klostermann and Andrés Ceballos-Baumann. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Neurology, The Lancet, Journal of Sleep Research and European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.