Udo Polzer
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 1
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Marcus R. Streit (1 shared paper)Wolfgang Wölwer (1 shared paper)Hans Wolfgang Kölmel (1 shared paper)S. Merkelbach (1 shared paper)Hartmut Schulz (1 shared paper)F. Hoffmann (1 shared paper)J. Klingelhöfer (1 shared paper)W. Gaebel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (2 papers)European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (1 paper)Journal of Neurology (1 paper)Clinical Neuropharmacology (1 paper)Der Nervenarzt (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Udo Polzer
8 papers receiving 195 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Psychiatry and Mental health 82
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
- Clinical Psychology 53
- Cognitive Neuroscience 44
Countries citing papers authored by Udo Polzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Polzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Polzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Polzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Polzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Polzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Polzer. The network helps show where Udo Polzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Udo Polzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 6 | [Are visual and auditory perception modified in psychopathological assessment of expressive markers of psychiatric patients?]. | 1993 | 5 |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 0 |
About Udo Polzer
Udo Polzer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (53 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations). Udo Polzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marcus R. Streit, Wolfgang Wölwer, Hans Wolfgang Kölmel, S. Merkelbach, Hartmut Schulz, F. Hoffmann, J. Klingelhöfer, W. Gaebel, Juliane Schelhorn and Thomas Sobanski. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Journal of Neurology, Clinical Neuropharmacology and Der Nervenarzt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.