W. Gaebel

29 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

W. Gaebel
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 179
  • Philosophy 80
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Neurology 33
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 46
Replace Annick Urfer-Parnas with:
Annick Urfer-Parnas Denmark
Karen L. Wilhelm United States
Annemarie Stiekema Netherlands
Hisham Hafez United States
Marcia Kaplan United States
Selwyn Renard Netherlands
Tyson Sawchuk Canada
C. Williams United States
Aubrey M. Moe United States
Theresa R. Mahon United States
W. Gaebel relative to Annick Urfer-Parnas Denmark Annick Urfer-Parnas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Annick Urfer-Parnas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Gaebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Gaebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Gaebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Gaebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Gaebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Gaebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Gaebel. The network helps show where W. Gaebel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Gaebel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Gaebel Line = papers co-authored together W. Gaebel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200763
2 198637
3 201033
4 198723
5
[The social status of schizophrenic patients].
199819
6 200519
7 200013
8 200410
9 200010
10 19868
11 20116
12 19876
13 19935
14
[Quality indicators of patient treatment of schizophrenic patients. Results of a pilot study for external quality assurance using tracer diagnosis].
19985
15 20045
16 19864
17
Guidelines based on decision support software. Quality management in neurological outpatient schizophrenia treatment
20064
18 19873
19 20032
20 19862

About W. Gaebel

W. Gaebel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (179 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (88 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (46 citations). W. Gaebel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include A. Pietzcker, Jürgen Zielasek, Jim van Os, Judith Allardyce, Wolfgang Köpcke, F. Müller‐Spahn, Nicole Frommann, G. Ulrich, Péter Müller and J. Tegeler. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, European Psychiatry and Methods of Information in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact