U. Weber

1.7k citations
72 papers · 764 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 7
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 7
    • Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity 5
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 5
    • Retinal Development and Disorders 6

U. Weber

68 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

U. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Transplantation 44
  • Ophthalmology 70
  • Infectious Diseases 100
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Polymers and Plastics 56
Replace Kate Ryan with:
Kate Ryan United Kingdom
Christine Nguyen United States
Byung Hyun Choi South Korea
Sang Hoon Song South Korea
Anita Patel United States
Hilde Beele Belgium
Walter Peters Canada
Chunmei Wang China
Bahatti̇n Çeli̇köz Türkiye
Teresa Oranges Italy
U. Weber relative to Kate Ryan United Kingdom Kate Ryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Kate Ryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by U. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Weber. The network helps show where U. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside U. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with U. Weber Line = papers co-authored together U. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200653
2 202252
3 202141
4 202140
5 200940
6 199839
7 201631
8 200930
9 201228
10 200326
11 201522
12 201321
13 201319
14 201918
15 198517
16 201017
17 201015
18 200915
19 201514
20 198713

About U. Weber

U. Weber is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 72 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (44 citations), Ophthalmology (70 citations), Infectious Diseases (100 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (56 citations). U. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. Goerz, Klemens Budde, Sabine Amberg‐Schwab, Klaus Noller, Fabian Halleck, Rinaldo Bellomo, Andrew Hilton, Eva Schrezenmeier, Mira Choi and Andrea Ladwig. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Medicine, Transplant International, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact