TU Ming-li

419 citations
7 papers · 321 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
    • Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
    • Dental Health and Care Utilization
    • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Papers in

TU Ming-li

7 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

TU Ming-li
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Periodontics 109
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
  • General Dentistry 4
Replace Ruoqiong Chen with:
Ruoqiong Chen United States
Akihiro Yashima Japan
Daniel Hagenfeld Germany
Odd Carsten Koldsland Norway
Charles E. Hawley United States
E. Amelina Russia
Marianne Meng Ann Ong Singapore
Karin Jepsen Germany
Manuel E. Cevallos United States
Torsten Koburger‐Janssen Germany
TU Ming-li relative to Ruoqiong Chen United States Ruoqiong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Ruoqiong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by TU Ming-li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of TU Ming-li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by TU Ming-li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TU Ming-li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by TU Ming-li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by TU Ming-li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by TU Ming-li. The network helps show where TU Ming-li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside TU Ming-li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with TU Ming-li Line = papers co-authored together TU Ming-li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2012133
2 202089
3 201935
4 201933
5 201018
6 20217
7 20226

About TU Ming-li

TU Ming-li is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Periodontics, Molecular Medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (1 paper), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (1 paper), Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (1 paper) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (109 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations) and General Dentistry (4 citations). TU Ming-li has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xian‐Tao Zeng, Dong Zheng, Wei‐Dong Leng, Jing Zhang, Hanqin Wang, Jin Li, Junyi Li, Long Lei, Yuqin Huang and Qiang Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, Life Sciences, Royal Society Open Science, Military Medical Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact