Trine Porsgaard

33 papers receiving 804 citations

Peers

Trine Porsgaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 274
  • Biochemistry 98
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 207
  • Pharmaceutical Science 43
  • Food Science 98
Replace Josiane De with:
Josiane De France
Rosanna W. S. Chung Australia
Leon Zhou United States
Abdulaziz S. Saeedan Saudi Arabia
B Pasquier France
Mohammad Hossein Aarabi Iran
I A Tavares United Kingdom
Valentina De Nunzio Italy
Frédéric Ziegler France
Yuwei Liu China
Trine Porsgaard relative to Josiane De France Josiane De's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Josiane De · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trine Porsgaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trine Porsgaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trine Porsgaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trine Porsgaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trine Porsgaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trine Porsgaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trine Porsgaard. The network helps show where Trine Porsgaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trine Porsgaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trine Porsgaard Line = papers co-authored together Trine Porsgaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005217
2 2018144
3 202188
4 200043
5 200743
6 200239
7 200531
8
Rodent model choice has major impact on variability of standard preclinical readouts associated with diabetes and obesity research.
201631
9 199917
10 201617
11 200316
12 200015
13 201113
14 201812
15 200611
16 201610
17 201810
18 20039
19 19999
20 20058

About Trine Porsgaard

Trine Porsgaard is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (15 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (9 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (274 citations), Biochemistry (98 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (207 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (43 citations) and Food Science (98 citations). Trine Porsgaard has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Huiling Mu, Carl‐Erik Høy, Jens Lykkesfeldt, Hanne H. F. Refsgaard, Niels Rode Kristensen, Xuebing Xu, Ellen Marie Straarup, Henning Hvid, Nina Skall Nielsen and René Holm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology and Food Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact