Torsten Loop

92 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Torsten Loop
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Developmental Neuroscience 440
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 431
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 418
  • Emergency Medicine 312
  • Biochemistry 167
Replace Benedikt H. J. Pannen with:
Benedikt H. J. Pannen Germany
Inge Bauer Germany
Simon Gelman United States
Ulrich Goebel Germany
Kahoru Nishina Japan
Hidefumi Obara Japan
Katsuya Mikawa Japan
Nina C. Weber Netherlands
K. Taeger Germany
Frederic T. Billings United States
Torsten Loop relative to Benedikt H. J. Pannen Germany Benedikt H. J. Pannen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Benedikt H. J. Pannen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Torsten Loop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Torsten Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torsten Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torsten Loop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Torsten Loop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torsten Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torsten Loop. The network helps show where Torsten Loop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Torsten Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Torsten Loop Line = papers co-authored together Torsten Loop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003333
2 2005162
3 1999122
4 2000116
5 2010102
6 200789
7 199566
8 200054
9 201652
10 200251
11 200851
12 201250
13 200750
14 201348
15 200145
16 201445
17 200844
18 201542
19 200840
20 201940

About Torsten Loop

Torsten Loop is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (20 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (18 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (15 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (14 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (13 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (11 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (440 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (431 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (418 citations), Emergency Medicine (312 citations) and Biochemistry (167 citations). Torsten Loop has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include K. Geiger, Alexander Hoetzel, René Schmidt, Matjaž Humar, Benedikt H. J. Pannen, Ulrich Goebel, Hans‐Joachim Priebe, Heike L. Pahl, Augustine M.K. Choi and Martin Roesslein. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, PLoS ONE and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact