Tor Elsås

1.0k citations
42 papers · 817 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tor Elsås

42 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Tor Elsås
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Ophthalmology 388
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 185
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 108
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 41
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 131
Replace M.P.M. ten Tusscher with:
M.P.M. ten Tusscher Netherlands
Carl Ellenberger United States
Akira Imai Japan
Nurşen Yüksel Türkiye
Raquel Alarcia Spain
Gena Heidary United States
Kozo Katsumura Japan
Christine Adrion Germany
Per Monstad Norway
Janet M. Vargo United States
Tor Elsås relative to M.P.M. ten Tusscher Netherlands M.P.M. ten Tusscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
M.P.M. ten Tusscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tor Elsås

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tor Elsås's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tor Elsås with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tor Elsås more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tor Elsås

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tor Elsås. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tor Elsås. The network helps show where Tor Elsås may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tor Elsås, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tor Elsås Line = papers co-authored together Tor Elsås links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200196
2 198893
3 199186
4 199450
5 199547
6 201033
7 199632
8 200631
9 200823
10 200321
11 198821
12 198721
13 198720
14 199219
15
The missing rectus: a CT observation from blow-out fracture of the orbital floor.
198719
16 199118
17 198715
18 199613
19 199113
20 199012

About Tor Elsås

Tor Elsås is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 817 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (4 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (388 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (185 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (108 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (41 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (131 citations). Tor Elsås has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Uddman, F. Sundler, Lars Edvinsson, Harald Johnsen, Amund Ringvold, Sigmund Blika, Katja von Hoff, Toshihiko Shimizu, Norihiro Suzuki and Svein Anda. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMC Ophthalmology, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and Regulatory Peptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact