Tor Elsås

1.0k citations
42 papers · 746 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tor Elsås

42 papers receiving 716 citations

Peers

Tor Elsås
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Ophthalmology 425
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 175
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 221
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 108
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 124
Replace Akira Imai with:
Akira Imai Japan
Christophe Delaey Belgium
Carl Ellenberger United States
Rita Restuccia Italy
Bettina Wabbels Germany
Panitha Jindahra Thailand
Christine Adrion Germany
S. Medaglini Italy
Annalisa Colombi Italy
Edward J. Parr Canada
Tor Elsås relative to Akira Imai Japan Akira Imai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.8×
Akira Imai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tor Elsås

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tor Elsås's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tor Elsås with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tor Elsås more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tor Elsås

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tor Elsås. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tor Elsås. The network helps show where Tor Elsås may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tor Elsås, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tor Elsås Line = papers co-authored together Tor Elsås links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200190
2 198887
3 199182
4 199543
5 199442
6 201033
7 199625
8 200625
9 200321
10 200820
11 198820
12 198719
13 199118
14 199217
15 198717
16
The missing rectus: a CT observation from blow-out fracture of the orbital floor.
198717
17 198715
18 199113
19 199012
20 199212

About Tor Elsås

Tor Elsås is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (4 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (425 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (175 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (221 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (108 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (124 citations). Tor Elsås has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Uddman, Lars Edvinsson, F. Sundler, Harald Johnsen, Sigmund Blika, Amund Ringvold, Norihiro Suzuki, Toshihiko Shimizu, Katja von Hoff and Tony Jer‐Fu Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMC Ophthalmology and Neuropeptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact