Tomoko Ando

45 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Tomoko Ando
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 147
  • Hematology 75
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 120
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 48
Replace Filia Apostolakou with:
Filia Apostolakou Greece
Jason Ulip Tilan United States
Ning Song China
C. J. Strasburger Germany
Chunlu Li China
Anja Kretschmer Germany
D. R. Weightman United Kingdom
Gerard J. Pesman Netherlands
George M. Bright United States
Marco Antonio Palumbo Italy
Tomoko Ando relative to Filia Apostolakou Greece Filia Apostolakou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Filia Apostolakou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomoko Ando

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomoko Ando's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomoko Ando with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomoko Ando more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomoko Ando

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomoko Ando. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomoko Ando. The network helps show where Tomoko Ando may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomoko Ando, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomoko Ando Line = papers co-authored together Tomoko Ando links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014172
2 2000139
3 201295
4 199640
5 201139
6
In vivo comparison of PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals in detecting breast cancer.
199838
7 201235
8 200234
9 201032
10 199624
11 201522
12 201419
13 198618
14 201218
15 201318
16 200715
17 201915
18 201613
19 201911
20 199610

About Tomoko Ando

Tomoko Ando is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cancer Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 907 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (147 citations), Hematology (75 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (48 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (120 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (48 citations). Tomoko Ando has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Yoshinobu Ishitobi, Taiga Ninomiya, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Jotaro Akiyoshi, Masayuki Kanehisa, Yoshihiro Maruyama, Junko Kurokawa, Yasunari Kanda, Tetsushi Furukawa and Seiji Kobayashi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics and Genes and Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact