Tomáš Peterka
Impact in
- Ecology top 10%
- Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
-
- Bryophyte Studies and Records
- Lichen and fungal ecology
Papers in
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 29
- Ecology 26
- Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology 24
- Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics 5
- Co-authors
- Michal Hájek (29 shared papers)Zuzana Plesková (14 shared papers)Petra Hájková (20 shared papers)Martin Jiroušek (9 shared papers)Daniel Dítě (14 shared papers)Vít Syrovátka (4 shared papers)Tomáš Hájek (3 shared papers)Jana Navrátilová (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Tomáš Peterka
36 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Ecology 234
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 132
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 64
- Plant Science 176
- Ecological Modeling 19
Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Peterka
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Peterka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Peterka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Peterka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Peterka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Peterka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Peterka. The network helps show where Tomáš Peterka may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Peterka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 4 | Changes in the moss layer in Czech fens indicate earlysuccession triggered by nutrient enrichment | 2015 | 32 |
| 5 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 10 | Testing floristic and environmental differentiation of richfens on the Bohemian Massif | 2014 | 13 |
| 11 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 4 |
About Tomáš Peterka
Tomáš Peterka is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science and Insect Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (29 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (24 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (17 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (12 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (5 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (234 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (132 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (64 citations), Plant Science (176 citations) and Ecological Modeling (19 citations). Tomáš Peterka has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michal Hájek, Zuzana Plesková, Petra Hájková, Martin Jiroušek, Daniel Dítě, Vít Syrovátka, Tomáš Hájek, Jana Navrátilová, Michal Horsák and Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, The Science of The Total Environment, Folia Geobotanica, Ecological Indicators and Preslia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.