Libor Petr
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Tree-ring climate responses
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil and Environmental Studies
Papers in
- Soil Science 40
- Soil and Environmental Studies 40
- Paleontology 26
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 26
- Co-authors
- Vlasta Jankovská (8 shared papers)Václav Treml (5 shared papers)Jan Novák (8 shared papers)Petra Hájková (17 shared papers)Michal Hájek (14 shared papers)Petr Pokorný (5 shared papers)Petr Kuneš (3 shared papers)Lydie Dudová (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Libor Petr
73 papers receiving 905 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Atmospheric Science 348
- Soil Science 340
- Space and Planetary Science 24
- Archeology 26
- Paleontology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Libor Petr
This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Petr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Petr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Petr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Petr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Petr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Petr. The network helps show where Libor Petr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libor Petr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 6 | : Czech Quaternary Palynological Database - PALYCZ: review andbasic statistics of the data | 2009 | 40 |
| 7 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 18 | A pollen-based quantitative reconstruction of the Holocenevegetation updates a perspective on the natural vegetation inthe Czech Republic and Slovakia | 2016 | 18 |
| 19 | Holocene timberline fluctuations in the mid-mountains of Central Europe | 2006 | 16 |
| 20 | 2017 | 16 |
About Libor Petr
Libor Petr is a scholar working on Soil Science, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, Archeology and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 86 papers that have together received 954 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Environmental Studies (40 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (28 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (26 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (13 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers), Medieval Architecture and Archaeology (7 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers) and Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (348 citations), Soil Science (340 citations), Space and Planetary Science (24 citations), Archeology (26 citations) and Paleontology (175 citations). Libor Petr has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vlasta Jankovská, Václav Treml, Jan Novák, Petra Hájková, Michal Hájek, Petr Pokorný, Petr Kuneš, Lydie Dudová, Eva Jamrichová and Michal Horsák. Their work appears in journals such as Quaternary Science Reviews, CATENA, Archaeologia historica, The Holocene and Preslia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.