Tomáš Etrych

209 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers

Tomáš Etrych
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Biomaterials 4.0k
  • Polymers and Plastics 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.6k
  • Molecular Medicine 264
  • Organic Chemistry 1.4k
Replace Marı́a J. Vicent with:
Marı́a J. Vicent Spain
Vladimír Šubr Czechia
Gianfranco Pasut Italy
Zhuxian Zhou China
Blanka Řı́hová Czechia
Jin‐Zhi Du China
Shigeto Fukushima Japan
Tianmeng Sun China
Younsoo Bae United States
Yuanpei Li United States
Tomáš Etrych relative to Marı́a J. Vicent Spain Marı́a J. Vicent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marı́a J. Vicent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Etrych

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Etrych's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Etrych with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Etrych more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Etrych

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Etrych. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Etrych. The network helps show where Tomáš Etrych may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Etrych, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomáš Etrych Line = papers co-authored together Tomáš Etrych links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 221 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001296
2 2010218
3 2003170
4 2011150
5 2013143
6 2002125
7 2012125
8 2010124
9 2012112
10 2016111
11 2010111
12 2008110
13 2008109
14 2005107
15 2004107
16 200194
17 201193
18 201291
19 201890
20 200490

About Tomáš Etrych

Tomáš Etrych is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 221 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (138 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (63 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (36 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (32 papers), Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (29 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (15 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (14 papers) and Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (4.0k citations), Polymers and Plastics (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.6k citations), Molecular Medicine (264 citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations). Tomáš Etrych has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Karel Ulbrich, Petr Chytil, Blanka Řı́hová, M. Jelı́nková, J. Strohalm, Vladimír Šubr, Milada Šírová, Michal Pechar, Tomáš Mrkvan and Libor Kostka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Controlled Release, Biomacromolecules, Physiological Research, Pharmaceutics and Macromolecular Bioscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact