Tom Wells

21 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Tom Wells
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Horticulture 9
  • Computer Science Applications 36
  • Communication 35
  • Transportation 25
  • Information Systems and Management 24
Replace Seong-Hee Kim with:
Seong-Hee Kim South Korea
Adam M. Williams United States
Charles K. Davis United States
Eric Abbott United States
Kristin Hoffmann Canada
Claudia Eugenia Toca Torres Colombia
Wataru Toyokawa Japan
Florent Okry Benin
Richard Hosking Australia
Yin‐Hui Cheng Taiwan
Tom Wells relative to Seong-Hee Kim South Korea Seong-Hee Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Seong-Hee Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Wells. The network helps show where Tom Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Wells Line = papers co-authored together Tom Wells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201387
2 201455
3 201338
4 202020
5 202117
6 201417
7 202315
8 202215
9 201515
10 20209
11 20158
12 20225
13 20015
14
Trends in AFDC Participation Rates: The Implications for Welfare Reform
19964
15
Senior Inquiry: A University/High School Collaboration
20032
16 20002
17 20241
18 20241
19 20231
20 20221

About Tom Wells

Tom Wells is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (9 citations), Computer Science Applications (36 citations), Communication (35 citations), Transportation (25 citations) and Information Systems and Management (24 citations). Tom Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Link, John R. Wood, Robert W. Scotland, Pablo Muñoz‐Rodríguez, Tom Carruthers, Graham B. Seymour, Laura Pérez-Fons, Peter M. Bramley, Christopher Gerrish and Michael H. Beale. Their work appears in journals such as Taxon, Systematics and Biodiversity, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Science Computer Review and Trends in Plant Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact