Tom Vanwing
Impact in
-
- Online Learning and Analytics
Papers in
- Education 18
- Online and Blended Learning 8
- Reflective Practices in Education 4
- Dutch Social and Cultural Studies 3
- Higher Education Research Studies 3
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 4
- Co-authors
- Chang Zhu (8 shared papers)Céline Cocquyt (8 shared papers)Anh Nguyet Diep (7 shared papers)Liesbeth De Donder (4 shared papers)Dominique Verté (4 shared papers)Sarah Dury (3 shared papers)Tine Buffel (2 shared papers)Wolfgang Jacquet (8 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Tom Vanwing
31 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Computer Science Applications 63
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
- Demography 88
- Health 49
- Education 165
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Vanwing
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Vanwing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Vanwing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Vanwing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Vanwing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Vanwing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Vanwing. The network helps show where Tom Vanwing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Vanwing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 7 | Adult learners' needs in online and blended learning | 2019 | 28 |
| 8 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 17 | Online interaction quality among adult learners: The role of sense of belonging and perceived learning benefits | 2017 | 6 |
| 18 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 5 |
About Tom Vanwing
Tom Vanwing is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (63 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Demography (88 citations), Health (49 citations) and Education (165 citations). Tom Vanwing has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Poland and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Chang Zhu, Céline Cocquyt, Anh Nguyet Diep, Liesbeth De Donder, Dominique Verté, Sarah Dury, Tine Buffel, Wolfgang Jacquet, Nico De Witte and Farid Dahdouh‐Guebas. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Journal for Nature Conservation, Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, International Journal of Lifelong Education and The Internet and Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.