Tom Scott
Impact in
Papers in
- History 28
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 22
- European Political History Analysis 4
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 6
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 5
- European history and politics 3
- Co-authors
- David W. Foy (1 shared paper)Donald M. Prue (1 shared paper)Robert G. Rychtarik (1 shared paper)Bob Scribner (1 shared paper)Karl H. Dannenfeldt (1 shared paper)Geoffrey Palmer (1 shared paper)Hanna van Waart (1 shared paper)Simon J Mitchell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Historical Journal (4 papers)German Studies Review (3 papers)Journal of Early Modern History (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Tom Scott
52 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- History 177
- Classics 51
- Political Science and International Relations 164
- Economics and Econometrics 122
- Religious studies 16
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Scott. The network helps show where Tom Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The peasantries of Europe : from the fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries | 1998 | 72 |
| 2 | 1987 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 44 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 15 | Environmental politics: A greenprint for New Zealand | 1990 | 7 |
| 16 | Dunbar: A critical exposition of the poems | 1977 | 6 |
| 17 | Thomas Müntzer: Theology and Revolution in the German Reformation | 1989 | 6 |
| 18 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 5 |
About Tom Scott
Tom Scott is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (22 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (6 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (5 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (177 citations), Classics (51 citations), Political Science and International Relations (164 citations), Economics and Econometrics (122 citations) and Religious studies (16 citations). Tom Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David W. Foy, Donald M. Prue, Robert G. Rychtarik, Bob Scribner, Karl H. Dannenfeldt, Geoffrey Palmer, Hanna van Waart, Simon J Mitchell, Charles T. Garten and Paul M. Hohenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Historical Journal, German Studies Review, Journal of Early Modern History, The American Historical Review and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.