Eileen Spring
Impact in
- Law top 5%
- Legal principles and applications
- Family and Matrimonial Law
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in
- History 8
- Historical Studies of British Isles 4
-
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 9
- Medieval and Early Modern Justice 7
- Co-authors
- David Spring (5 shared papers)A. W. Brian Simpson (1 shared paper)Sybil Wolfram (1 shared paper)Lloyd Bonfield (2 shared papers)Linda A. Pollock (1 shared paper)Amy Louise Erickson (1 shared paper)Lawrence Stone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)American Journal of Legal History (3 papers)Journal of History (3 papers)The Economic History Review (3 papers)Law and History Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eileen Spring
20 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Law 41
- Economics and Econometrics 75
- History 47
- Political Science and International Relations 63
- Classics 11
Countries citing papers authored by Eileen Spring
This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen Spring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen Spring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen Spring. The network helps show where Eileen Spring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Eileen Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 42 | |
| 2 | Ecology and religion in history | 1974 | 31 |
| 3 | 1988 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1956 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 1 |
About Eileen Spring
Eileen Spring is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Economics and Econometrics and Soil Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Legal Studies and Society (9 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (7 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers), Family and Matrimonial Law (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (41 citations), Economics and Econometrics (75 citations), History (47 citations), Political Science and International Relations (63 citations) and Classics (11 citations). Eileen Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Spring, A. W. Brian Simpson, Sybil Wolfram, Lloyd Bonfield, Linda A. Pollock, Amy Louise Erickson and Lawrence Stone. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, American Journal of Legal History, Journal of History, The Economic History Review and Law and History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.