Tom Pieper

3.5k citations
52 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Pieper

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tom Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 828
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 330
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 226
  • Neurology 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
Replace Francesco Deleo with:
Francesco Deleo Italy
S. M. Sisodiya United Kingdom
Eduardo Paglioli Brazil
Martina Bebin United States
Heinz Pannek Germany
Catalina Dunoyer United States
Mathilde Chipaux France
G Kurlemann Germany
Jagdish Shah United States
Gert Wiegand Germany
Tom Pieper relative to Francesco Deleo Italy Francesco Deleo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Francesco Deleo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Pieper. The network helps show where Tom Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Tom Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008176
2 2002157
3 2011101
4 200570
5 201467
6 200154
7 201039
8 201838
9 200636
10 200633
11 200830
12 201730
13 201627
14 200127
15 202125
16 201023
17 201322
18 201522
19 201221
20 201421

About Tom Pieper

Tom Pieper is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (28 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (9 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (828 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (330 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (226 citations), Neurology (57 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations). Tom Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans Holthausen, Ingmar Blümcke, Manfred Kudernatsch, Peter Winkler, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, D. Kolodziejczyk, Martin Staudt, Hans Holthausen, Roland Coras and E. Pauli. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropediatrics, Epilepsia, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, Acta Neuropathologica and Child s Nervous System.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact