Peter Winkler

168 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Peter Winkler
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 344
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.3k
  • Geometry and Topology 458
  • Mathematical Physics 408
  • Statistics and Probability 371
Replace Dominic Welsh with:
Dominic Welsh United Kingdom
Oren Patashnik United States
David H. Bailey United States
William B. Jones United States
Shmuel Friedland United States
Peter Borwein Canada
Prasad Tetali United States
H. F. Trotter United States
W. J. Thron United States
Brendan D. McKay Australia
Peter Winkler relative to Dominic Welsh United Kingdom Dominic Welsh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dominic Welsh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Winkler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Winkler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Winkler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Winkler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Winkler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Winkler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Winkler. The network helps show where Peter Winkler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Winkler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Winkler Line = papers co-authored together Peter Winkler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 185 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983266
2 1984154
3 1991149
4 1996110
5 1985103
6 1991102
7 199399
8 199983
9 199883
10 199877
11 199676
12 199071
13 200168
14 199547
15 197445
16 199542
17 199641
18 197840
19 198239
20 199739

About Peter Winkler

Peter Winkler is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mathematical Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Statistics and Probability, having authored 185 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (32 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (25 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (25 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (23 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (22 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (14 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (13 papers) and Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (344 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.3k citations), Geometry and Topology (458 citations), Mathematical Physics (408 citations) and Statistics and Probability (371 citations). Peter Winkler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Graham Brightwell, Richard J. Nowakowski, Ronald Graham, Prasad Tetali, László Lovász, Gordon Wilfong, Paul Seymour, Robert Yaris, Moni Naor and Ronald Fagin. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Communications of the ACM, Random Structures and Algorithms, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact