Tom Nesmith
Impact in
- Conservation top 0.1%
- Digital and Traditional Archives Management
-
- Information Science and Libraries
- Library Science and Information
Papers in
- Conservation 17
- Digital and Traditional Archives Management 17
- Law 1
- Legal processes and jurisprudence 1
- Family and Matrimonial Law 1
- Journals
- Archivaria (8 papers)The American Archivist (1 paper)Archival Science (1 paper)Archives and Museum Informatics (2 papers)Journal of the Society of Archivists (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Tom Nesmith
15 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Conservation 251
- Information Systems 25
- Space and Planetary Science 1
- Museology 4
- Library and Information Sciences 2
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Nesmith
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Nesmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Nesmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Nesmith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Nesmith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Nesmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Nesmith. The network helps show where Tom Nesmith may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 3 | Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the "Ghosts" of Archival Theory | 1999 | 36 |
| 4 | Reopening Archives: Bringing New Contextualities into Archival Theory and Practice | 2006 | 35 |
| 5 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 6 | Canadian Archival Studies and the Rediscovery of Provenance | 1993 | 19 |
| 7 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 9 | Archives from the Bottom Up: Social History and Archival Scholarship | 1982 | 7 |
| 10 | What's History Got to Do With It?: Reconsidering the Place of HistoricalKnowledge in Archival Work | 2004 | 6 |
| 11 | Re-exploring the continuum, rediscovering archives | 2008 | 3 |
| 12 | "Professional Education in the Most Expansive Sense": What Will the Archivist Need to Know in the Twenty-First Century | 1996 | 2 |
| 13 | Toward the Archival Stage in the History of Knowledge | 2015 | 2 |
| 14 | Principle of provenance | 2015 | 2 |
| 15 | "Pen and Plough" at Ontario Agricultural College, 1874–1910 | 1984 | 1 |
| 16 | Una visión de los archivos: posmodernismo y cambio del espacio intelectual de los archivos | 2007 | 1 |
| 17 | Terry Cook, 1947–2014 | 2015 | 1 |
| 18 | 2023 | 0 |
About Tom Nesmith
Tom Nesmith is a scholar working on Conservation, Law, History, Political Science and International Relations and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (17 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (1 paper), Legal processes and jurisprudence (1 paper), Family and Matrimonial Law (1 paper), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper) and Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (251 citations), Information Systems (25 citations), Space and Planetary Science (1 citation), Museology (4 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (2 citations). Tom Nesmith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Their work appears in journals such as Archivaria, The American Archivist, Archival Science, Archives and Museum Informatics and Journal of the Society of Archivists.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.