Archival Science

519 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 519 papers published in Archival Science in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Archival Science usually cover Conservation (334 papers), Space and Planetary Science (140 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (99 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (329 papers), Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (140 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archival Science are Terry Cook, Ann Laura Stoler, Eric Ketelaar, Verne Harris, Joan M. Schwartz, Michelle Caswell, Sue McKemmish, Anne J. Gilliland, Jeannette A. Bastian and Isto Huvila.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archival Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archival Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archival Science.

Countries where authors publish in Archival Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archival Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archival Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archival Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025